SAN FRANCISCO (CBS / AP) — San Francisco voters have approved a controversial ordinance that will soon restrict when to sit or lie on city sidewalks.

Voters on Tuesday supported Measure L, known as the “sit/lie” ordinance, that would ban sitting or lying on sidewalks between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m.

The new ordinance requires police to issue a warning before citing or fining anyone, but repeat offenders could face jail time.

Supporters of “sit/lie” say residents are often harassed by people who sit all day on sidewalks. Opponents say the measure unfairly targets the homeless and day laborers.

The initiative took shape after Police Chief George Gascon proposed a citywide “sit-lie” ordinance, giving officers the authority to move and cite those who block sidewalks or otherwise intimidate pedestrians.

“The chief advocated very actively on his own time and the public vote has decided the matter,” SFPD Lt. Lyn Tomioka said Wednesday.

After the Board of Supervisors voted down Gascon’s proposal in June, Mayor Gavin Newsom to take the issue straight to voters.

Newsom became motivated after seeing a guy smoking crack cocaine while taking his infant daughter on a stroll shortly after moving to the iconic Haight-Ashbury neighborhood earlier this year.

That episode came after Haight residents and storekeepers had long complained to city officials about overbearing transients blocking pedestrians and aggressive panhandling.

Even two neighborhood group leaders held opposing views.

“This is something that people in San Francisco tried to do for the better part of 25 years,” Ted Loewenberg, president of the Haight Ashbury Improvement Association, said Wednesday. “We got it done!”

But Bruce Wolfe, vice president of the Haight Ashbury Neighborhood Council, believes that voters were not properly educated on the ramifications of a sit-lie law.

“I think people really don’t understand what this means,” Wolfe said Wednesday. “There’s plenty of laws already on the books similar to Measure L.”

The police department will soon issue guidelines on how officers will enforce the ordinance, Tomioka said.

Voters also rejected a competing ordinance, Measure M, which would have adopted mandatory police foot-patrol programs and invalidated Measure L if both passed.

(© 2010 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Comments (5)
  1. Rufino Santos says:

    I think Bruce Wolfe does not really understand what the approval of the proposition means: that San Franciscans are tired of obstructionists to a better San Francisco. It seems as though every time a proposal to help improve the City and living in the City is submitted the proponents are vilified as anti-homeless. The ordinance was initially going to be directed at the punks on Haight but for the hyperbole of the supervisor that supposedly represented the district the ordinance became city wide.

  2. SOMAtwocents says:

    For those of us who live and work in SOMA it needed to be citywide, but unfortunately I don’t expect the “do-nothing-except-stand-around-and-collect-overtime” SFPD to actually enforce it.

  3. giro says:

    Yah SFPD prob will do nothing, cuz there’s already an ordinance to not sleep in public parks during the day, too I believe, and that hasn’t done a whole lot. Personally, I’m kind of tired of the homeless defecating all over the civic center and allies where I live.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE