Help Wanted: Job Seeker Contacts ConsumerWatch

SAN JOSE (CBS 5) — Diana Hicks spends a lot of time on-line looking for work. But back in October, a company called “World Financial Group” came looking for her.

The first contact, Hicks says, was an upbeat sounding message on Hicks’s voicemail, in which the caller asked Hicks to call back at her earliest convenience. Hicks did, and she agreed to come for an interview at a World Financial Group office in San Jose.

But, Hicks says when she showed up for what she thought was a receptionist position, she was told “in order to get into the company, we need to do a background check.” And Hicks says she was asked to pay for it. “He (the interviewer) says the company can’t pay for the background check, so it’s $100,” Hicks recounted during an interview at her home in Gilroy.


Eager to get a job, and see what was on her report, Hicks paid the money and asked for a copy of the report. She says it never arrived. When Hicks called to ask about it and her $100, she says she was told “It was an initiation fee, not a background check, you must’ve gotten it wrong.”

“Anytime there is a cost when an applicant goes in, that should be raising red flags,” says Eric Rood of California Department of Industrial Relations. Rood says California law is clear.

“Under labor section 450B, it’s illegal for an employer to ask for any amount of money to apply for a job.”

But World Financial Group says it is not a traditional employer.

The company, which is based in Georgia, says its “associates” are “independent contractors,” who work for themselves selling financial products.

The company also told ConsumerWatch the $100 Hicks paid was a non-refundable processing fee, so that she could become an associate.

“I was very surprised to hear that they changed it,” Hicks says.

She says she made it clear at the interview she was only interested in a traditional office job.

World Financial Group wouldn’t respond to CBS5 questions about why Hicks was still charged the fee.

Diana Hicks isn’t the only one complaining about World Financial Group. ConsumerWatch found about 20 complaints online from job seekers all saying they too were asked to pay, or did pay, $100 for “background checks.”

“I was duped, bottom line,” Hicks says.

World Financial Group e-mailed Consumerwatch a statement saying it is “upfront and clear” in its practices. And, after our phone calls, the company did refund Hicks her $100. Money Hicks says she needs to continue her job search.

(© CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed)

  • Alexander

    I find it hard to believe that a person would allow themselves to pay $100 not knowing what it’s for. I believe Hicks knew, she just wanted her $100 back plain and simple, and was willing to do anything necessary to get it back. Even if it meant lying. Sad what this world has come to where people cannot own up to their mistakes. Besides, who knows how it was in her best interests to sell the story to the network. (she did say she had spent a lot of time online looking for a JOB. Find one yet?)

  • FinancialGuy

    It’s plain as day that the $100 is for an admin fee to become a 1099 self employed agent. The $100 is considerably less than what the average Real Estate Agent pays for his/her admin, license and start up costs.

    I agree with Alexander…She just probably wanted her money back once she found out there was work involved and went to extreme lengths to get it.

    I find it more amusing when news organizations like Channel 5 wonder why people are turning the channel in droves whenever the local news comes on….

    Can somebody say “Slow News Day”?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Guide To The Holidays
Shine A Light On The Holiday Season With ‘Giving Tuesday’

Listen Live