WOODSIDE (CBS SF) – A PG&E natural gas pipeline that exploded during pressure testing on Sunday afternoon, causing a mudslide across Interstate Highway 280 in Woodside, was likely damaged by a backhoe, a utility spokesman said Monday.

PG&E crews were determining how to extract and replace the damaged section of Line 132 Monday morning. The line ruptured during hydrostatic testing on a knoll above Highway 280 near Farm Hill Boulevard at 3:20 p.m., PG&E spokesman David Eisenhauer said.

A preliminary investigation indicated that the section of pipe that ruptured had been damaged by a backhoe sometime after the line was installed in 1947. PG&E is looking into when that damage might have occurred and what agency might have been responsible, Eisenhauer said.

KCBS’ Holly Quan Reports:

The explosion left a 5-foot-by-5-foot crater in the hillside, and water from inside the pipeline caused a mudslide that reached northbound

Highway 280 and blocked two lanes for about four hours, California Highway Patrol Officer Art Montiel said

No one was injured.

The test was being conducted as part of an ongoing safety evaluation of natural gas transmission lines in “high consequence” or highly populated areas, Eisenhauer said.

“That’s exactly why we do these type of safety tests, to find weaknesses in the pipeline,” Eisenhauer said.

PG&E crews have conducted pressure tests on more than 120 miles of pipeline since April.

Eisenhauer said no homes or buildings were damaged by Sunday’s rupture, and that the utility employs different testing strategies on pipelines that run directly through neighborhoods, such as placing cameras or “pigs” that run inside the pipes to detect corrosion or faulty seams.

<strong>KCBS’ Holly Quan Reports:</strong>

Last week, PG&E found a 1-millimeter leak in Line 132 in Palo Alto, and last month a line ruptured in Bakersfield during hydrostatic testing.

A faulty seam on Line 132 ruptured in San Bruno on Sept. 9, 2010, causing an explosion that killed eight people and damaged 38 homes.

(Copyright 2011 by CBS SF. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Comments (2)
  1. arch stanton says:

    “PG&E is looking into when that damage might have occurred and what agency might have been responsible, Eisenhauer said.”

    I’m PG&E will have a record of that.

  2. JD says:

    Why wasn’t Line 132 the first line to be pressure tested after the San Bruno explosion? PG&E has wanted to raise pressure in that line for at least six months, painting a cold picture for penninsula residents this winter if they couldn’t raise the pressure. I’m glad they weren’t allowed to.

    “That’s exactly why we do these type of safety tests…” when they’re forced to and in which priority? This does nothing to raise my confidence in PG&E.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

More From CBS San Francisco

Get The New CBS SF Bay Area Local App
LIVE: Monday through Friday from 3am – 3pm PST

Watch & Listen LIVE