OAKLAND (CBS SF) — Oakland Mayor Jean Quan proposed laying off at least 105 city employees Monday to help the city balance its budget in order to cope with the state’s decision to eliminate redevelopment agencies statewide.

Quan said she and City Administrator Deanna Santana are proposing the layoffs because the city must act in order to comply with a recent California Supreme Court ruling that upheld Gov. Jerry Brown’s decision to eliminate redevelopment agencies.

Oakland joined many other cities from around the state who filed suit to try to stop Brown from eliminating the agencies.

Quan said the proposed layoffs are “very tough” and criticized Brown for doing away with the agencies, saying “it will hurt California cities’ ability to grow.”

Santana said it’s likely that more than 105 city employees will lose their jobs but the precise number isn’t yet known because city staff members are still rushing to finalize the details in order to comply with the court ruling.

Santana said the $28 million annually that the city received in redevelopment funds from the state completely funded 159 positions and partially funded another 69 positions so they at least partially paid for a total of 228 jobs.

KCBS’ Chris Filippi Reports:

Quan said the city now expects to have to lay off fewer employees than it originally anticipated because she and Santana are proposing to restructure city government by merging some departments and eliminating administrative services.

“There will be minimal cuts to core services and minimal cuts to police and fire,” Quan said.

She said no sworn personnel in Oakland’s police and fire departments will be laid off but some administrative services in those departments will be consolidated to cut costs.

Quan said there would be no cuts to libraries or services for seniors or the homeless but there will be some cuts to street-cleaning services and recreational programs.

The Oakland City Council will have a special meeting on Wednesday at which Quan and Santana will formally present their plan to balance the budget and make layoffs. The council, which has the power to modify their proposal, is then scheduled to vote on the matter on Jan. 31.

Santana issued layoff notices last week to 2,500 city employees who potentially could have been impacted by the layoffs in order to comply with the required 10-day notice for employees who could lose their jobs. The layoffs will be effective Feb. 3.

Linda Joseph, the field director for Service Employees International Union Local 1021, which represents many city employees, said “morale among city employees is very low because they’ve already made many sacrifices to help the city balance its budget.”

Joseph said she disagrees with the proposal by Quan and Santana to slash a large number of city employees at this time, saying she doesn’t think Oakland will lose all of its redevelopment money in February.

“I don’t agree with their approach and we don’t have a meeting of the minds,” Joseph said.

(Copyright 2012 by CBS San Francisco and Bay City News Service. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (4)
  1. Been there-do that says:

    Sorry, but I’ve ben laid off twice in the private sector. And I have no pensiion except for what I’ve saved with 401K money and social security. When the governments get real and reduce their pension costs and become more in line with the private sector, I will have more sympathy

    I want efficiencies in goverment and I want fair taxes and a secure retirement also.

  2. George Briggs says:

    Sorry you are out of touch with reality of working for the government, The reason government employee benefits include is because the average pay is lower than the private sector. Plus most government employees contribute to their pension plans. Plus the real reason why government is malfunctioning is because the politicians have placed their contributors in management positions. If the number of managers are cut back to private sector levels government would function much better. So voters you need to know more about what your elected officials are doing!

  3. Been there-do that says:

    Sorry George,but I don’t get 90% of my salary when I retire. I can’t retire at 55. I don’t get healthcare. You must be a public employee. I’m not guaranteed a fixed rate of return the public has to pay.

  4. Just the Facts says:

    Sorry Been There-do that. You need a reality fact check.
    I. Some government employees earn a 90 % pension if they work 30 years for the government. That will seldom happen in the public sector.

    II. To work 30 years you will have to be able to qualify physically and mentally for your position.. Plus you have to avoid angering any politician or their appointee’s wrath for trying to do the right thing and treat everyone equally.

    III. The ability to retire at 55 was originally for those engaged in physically demanding fire or police jobs. It was extended to others.

    IV. But If you fact check you will find 2.5% per year for 10 years times $2,800 per month is not a lot of money. That is what my wife receives as a government pension. She earned a social security pension so her income is still less than $2,000 per month. And she has to pay for her medical insurance out of pocket.

    Fact 1. the average California government employee’s pension is under $2,000 per month – check CAPERS on google to confirm.

    Fact 2. most government employees unlike private sector employees, do not receive social security or medicare.

    Fact 3. I after 10 years of working, have earned my social security pension about $1,900 per month. And I have earned my medicare medical coverage.

    Fact 4. after 10 years of government work my pension will be $1,900, the same as my social security pension. But, my social security pension reduced to $1,600 due to my performing government work!

    Fact 5. As an auditor my average collected additional business taxes for 5 years was $650,000 annually. That is over 7 times my pay. What did you do for your employer?

    Fact 6. government employees contribute up to 12% of their pay towards their pension. Their pension is a 15 year annuity. So after 15 years no more pension.

    Just the Facts, not 30 second political speeches & believed to be “facts” by uninformed people like Been There-do that. Guess who approved the pensions?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE