Before Mozilla Exec’s Donation To Prop 8, OkCupid.com CEO Also Donated To Anti-Gay Candidate
Get Breaking News First
Trending Stories On CBS SF
Drivers Voice Frustrations At Being Mistaken For Uber
Sebastopol Climber Dies From Fall In Yosemite After Proposing To Girlfriend
Northern California Patient Being Treated For Possible Exposure To Ebola Virus
Birds Bursting Into Flames Above Solar Farm Stirs Calls To Slow Expansion
Woman Carrying Cordless Drill, Believed To Be A Gun, Shot And Killed By San Jose Police
(CBS SF) — The CEO of dating service OkCupid.com, which urged customers not to use Mozilla’s Firefox browser because of the Mozilla CEO’s past support of Proposition 8, once donated to an anti-gay congressman, according to a report.
Conservative political website The Daily Caller reported that OkCupid’s CEO and co-founder Sam Yagan donated $500 to the Utah Rep. Chris Cannon in 2004.
Cannon, who was defeated in the 2008 Utah Republican Primary, has a 0% rating by the Human Rights Campaign for his stance on gay rights. Cannon has voted for a ban on gay adoption, supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, and voted no on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Last week, Brendan Eich stepped down as CEO of Mozilla after the fallout over his 2008 donation of $1,000 to the campaign for California’s same-sex marriage ban reached a fever pitch, helped in large part by OkCupid’s much-publicized lamentation of the Eich’s donation.
The resignation under fire by Eich over his donation has also caused a stir over free speech issues and has many online pundits surmising that OkCupid’s action against Mozilla was a well-calculated publicity stunt.
Yagan, who is also the CEO of OKCupid parent Match.com, sent CBS San Francisco a statement about his donation.
A decade ago, I made a contribution to Representative Chris Cannon because he was the ranking Republican on the House subcommittee that oversaw the Internet and Intellectual Property, matters important to my business and our industry. I accept responsibility for not knowing where he stood on gay rights in particular; I unequivocally support marriage equality and I would not make that contribution again today. However, a contribution made to a candidate with views on hundreds of issues has no equivalence to a contribution supporting Prop 8, a single issue that has no purpose other than to affirmatively prohibit gay marriage, which I believe is a basic civil right.