By Len Ramirez

FOSTER CITY (KPIX 5) — Foster City’s levee must be replaced. But the city is debating whether or not to factor in expected sea level rise caused by global warming.

It’s a project that would protect thousands of homes and save people from buying costly flood insurance.

A huge public works project to bring a bay area city, out of the flood zone.

There is a multi-million-dollar plan to shore up 8 miles of levee protecting Foster City.

Foster City’s levee holds back the San Francisco Bay and is still a popular recreation spot. But it falls short of federal flood control standards.

And must be replaced.

City manager Kevin Miller said, “It protects every resident of this city. It has to be done.”

Miller says not replacing the 8-mile long levee surrounding the city could lead to flooding and the financial disaster of the city being labeled a flood zone.

“It would absolutely reduce property values,” Miller said. “Every resident would be required to get flood insurance, which is problematic.”

Remaking the levee would be the biggest public works project in town since T. Jack Foster created the city by dumping 18 million cubic yards of dirt into a former marshland in the 1960’s.

At a special meeting on Monday afternoon, the city proposed selling bonds to pay the estimated $90 million price tag.

But the more controversial topic: whether to rebuild it three feet higher to be a safeguard against the projected future sea level rise due to global warming.

Bob Plivoris owns a house across the street from the levee. He says it would ruin his views and questions the need for a higher levee.

“I think they’re going a little too extreme with it,” Plivoris said. “I think it should be delayed for a few years to find out if it’s really necessary.”

From the city’s standpoint there’s no question it’s needed.

Others using the trail from nearby offices agree.

Neighbor Lars Lee-Potreck said, “We work in the energy business. For us it’s a given that global warming is real and the sea levels will rise. So if you start now and spread it over many years, I think it’s wise.”

Comments (3)
  1. Climate will do what climate will do as it has for hundreds of millions of years. Meanwhile, decisions and policy need to be based on hard fact.

    There are some crucial, verifiable facts – with citations – about human-generated carbon dixide and its effect on global warming people need to know and understand at

    The discussion is too long to post here but is a quick and easy read. I recommend following the links in the citations; some of them are very educational.

    1. H..r’s comment is less substantial than vaporware, as is the link which is a self-referral to what is nothing other than a statement of belief, H..r’s and H..r’s alone. He truly is a denier of science as just about all the numbers he throws out are irrelevant. H..r refuses to study the science on the subject while demonstrating he thinks he knows better than the community of thousands upon thousands of global climate studying scientists.
      H..r endlessly keeps on keeping on marketing his faux-science. It’s a sad day when CBS promotes faux-science as if it has any bearing on reality.

  2. IF (BIG IF) Foster City is going to get subsidized to build a higher levee, the real question should be what determines the priorities of public works funding? It appears that other cities are in more severe danger of flooding, and so, why are they not being aided FIRST by similar efforts. Coming to mind is definitely the South SF Bay as well as the SF Peninsula.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE