COVID Vaccinations:Bay Area COVID-19 Vaccine Resources Page
CBSN Bay AreaWatch Now
Filed Under:Airbnb, Barbara Taylor, David Chiu, Discriminatory, Ed Lee, HomeAway, Lawsuit, politics, San Francisco, Taxes, Unconstitutional
Airbnb pulled controversial anti-Prop F bus stop signs and billboards in San Francisco that were criticized as tone deaf. (Photo: Martha Kenney via Facebook)

SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS)— San Francisco’s new law legalizing home shares suffered a setback Monday when HomeAway filed a lawsuit challenging the measure.

HomeAway, a vacation rental marketplace, claimed the law unfairly benefits Airbnb while making it difficult for other home- share platforms to do business.

READ MORE: 'Not For The Faint Of Heart'; Bay Area Real Estate Market Heating Up To Pre-Pandemic Levels

The lawsuit claims the legislation, by supervisor David Chiu, was crafted in a way that legalized Airbnb home shares while preventing companies like theirs from doing business in San Francisco.

Micahel Simons, an attorney for HomeAway called the legislation discriminatory.

READ MORE: VIDEO: Space X Launch Lights Up Pre-Dawn Sky; Crew Headed Toward Space Station

“We see how the law is written and when you take it at face value, it’s discriminatory and unconstitutional and we plan to challenge it,” Simons said.

Meanwhile, opponents of home shares like San Francisco activist Dale Carlson, welcome the lawsuit as a way to shed light on what the new law actually does.

“It’s only after a very careful, very thorough reading of the legislation that actually passed the board [of supervisors, people realized; holy smokes. Not only did Chiu give theses guys a break on their back taxes, he gave them a monopoly,” Carlson.

MORE NEWS: UPDATE: Police Activity Cleared On Eastbound Lanes Of Bay Bridge; Commute Traffic Brings To Flow

Carlson and other home share opponents say legalizing home shares will hurt affordable housing and damage residential neighborhoods by allowing anyone’s home to become a hotel and they’re planning a ballot measure next year to challenge the law.