By Emily Turner

SANTA ROSA (KPIX 5) – Verizon has already built one church steeple with a cellphone tower inside it in Santa Rosa, now it wants to build another. And it wants to bypass the normal review process.

They are unlikely business partners, but Verizon wants to do a deal with a Santa Rosa church.

In the middle of a Santa Rosa neighborhood, one church has become ground zero in a crusade against Verizon.

Neighbor Cailyn McCauley said, “My first thought was: Why is Big Brother here? And do I want Big Brother in my backyard?”

Right across the street from McCauley’s home is Community Baptist Church. It’s gone 60 years without a steeple but now it, and Verizon, aim to change that.

The church would get a 62-foot high steeple, complete with a cross and six cellphone antennas.

Verizon already built and paid for a similar steeple at a church across town earlier this year.

“A 60-plus-foot tower looming over my house would be seen from all angles. My front yard, my side yard, my backyard, even the yard furthest from them. So, I just don’t want a commercial enterprise looking over my house,” McCauley said.

Because the antennas would be building-mounted, the permits for it are classified as minor rather than major,  meaning it goes before a different review authority and has a different public notification and appeals process.

It also doesn’t require a neighborhood meeting, though the city required one knowing cell towers are controversial business.

But not all neighbors are opposed.

Neighbor Theresa Schulz said, “I think it’s acceptable that Community Baptist Church takes that leap forward and ensures communication for this area.”

A Verizon spokesperson says service in the Santa Rosa area has consistently ranked low for coverage, a fact made clear in October’s fires.

This tower, Verizon says, would improve cell service for those living on the east side of town.

Something those in favor say is worth it.

“Communication was down everywhere for all of us. I could not reach my former spouse or my 13-year-old daughter during the firestorm for nine hours. They were unaccounted for. Possibly, if there were cellphone towers up in their neighborhood that did not burn, I could have reached them and been reassured that they were okay,” Schulz said.

For those who are concerned about the skyline or their cellphone coverage, the public comment period is open because that application has been submitted. However, the application is not complete at the moment. The Santa Rosa Planning Department expects to have a final decision in about eight weeks.

And this isn’t the only cellphone battle going on in Santa Rosa.

Verizon is also looking to put up more than 70 smaller cellphone antennas on PG&E utility poles and street lights.

That proposal has sparked a lot of debate in Santa Rosa as well.

Comments (14)
  1. There are serious health issues associated with proximity to cellphone towers/antennae. I am surprised that this article fails to mention the health implications. I for one would no longer attend a church that had them right over my head.

    1. I suggest you study a little antenna theory and signal propagation physics before posting such nonsense. FYI: antenna radiation is LOWEST directly below the antenna mast. Also, if you are so very concerned about the unproven negative effects of RF radiation on the human body, then please turn off your home Wi-Fi, your neighbors’ Wi-Fi, TV transmitters, and don’t forget to make fake media radio stations like this propaganda bullhorn go off the air and shut down their transmitters. Also, communication satellites must be shut down NOW! The same goes for weather satellites.

  2. Hate to break this to people but the cell phone companies have been putting antennas in Church steeples for the last 20 years. This is a common practice.

  3. Zak Watson says:

    Asian countries for Asians.

    Black countries for Blacks.

    but White countries for everybody?

    That’s genocide.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for Anti-White

  4. Chuck Blinn says:

    Welcome to 5-G wireless. Hundreds of small, low-power cell site stations at the height of street lights. You won’t even know there are antennas inside that church steeple. There is more RF energy coming from electronics in your house. So back you go to Russian collusion with somebody. Or labor union collusion with Democrats.

  5. It’s a nice way for a church to make a little rent money every month off the telecom giants. The trade-off is that, since technology improves quickly, (similar to how new smartphones come out from time to time.) Also, maintenance is needed at times. So, the antennas have to be upgraded or replaced, sometimes monthly, which means the workers have to access the steeple frequently. If providing that access isn’t a problem, the church stands to make a pretty penny from hosting the cell site on their property. If the health implications are a worry, I would recommend never holding a cellphone near your body.

  6. KR Rayberry says:

    Sounds about right, blubbering Northern Californians. They want the cool service it provides, but not the unsightly tower. Kind of like Malibu, they want the clean energy, but you sure better not put windmills off the coast.

    1. Typical lib hypocrisy. In San Francisco good libs say they want to “help the homeless” but when the city proposes building a bum center near their apartment complexes, all hell breaks loose. Not in their backyard! They want to look like they care and want to help, but when they are actually asked to practice what they preach so much, they run with their tails between their legs.

  7. World’s Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link – just recently.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s