SFPD Chief Defends Officers’ Actions In Videotaped Drug Bust

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS 5 / KCBS) — A combative San Francisco Police Chief Jeff Godown came out swinging at the city’s public defender Thursday, saying he saw nothing wrong with the actions of three undercover officers from the department’s Richmond Station who were accused of misconduct after being videotaped during a recent drug search and arrest.

“I’m troubled and perplexed why an elected official – Jeff Adachi – continues to paint the police department with a wide brush of police misconduct,” Godown said. “That is untrue.”

KCBS’ Holly Quan Reports:

With several dozen members of his command staff standing around him, Godown insisted that his three officers – Sgt. Thomas Watts and officers Michael Zhang and Michele Martinez – acted according to the law and did not lie in the police report of the incident.

But during a preliminary court hearing Wednesday, a judge dismissed the case of McLaren Wenzell, 23, after reviewing security footage showing the March 1 search of Wenzell’s apartment located near 33rd Avenue and Geary Boulevard in the city’s Outer Richmond neighborhood.

The video shows the three officers searching Wenzell’s apartment building.

The three officers’ badges cannot be seen in footage of the three standing in the building’s garage, nor are their badges seen later in additional footage of them roaming hallways on the building’s third floor in search of drug activity.

In police reports submitted to the court, Officer Zhang said the three officers had their badges exposed on their “outermost clothing.”

Zhang also said Watts asked for Wenzell’s consent to search his home, but in a news conference at Adachi’s office on Wednesday, Wenzell’s attorney Robert Amparan said the consent may have been coerced.

The chief on Thursday said the officers did get consent for the search and were not required to wear their badges as undercover cops, nor – he maintained – did the report say they did.

District Attorney George Gascon said that he too disagreed with the judge’s decision to drop the case, and that his office would continue to try and pursue charges against Wenzell.

The case is one of 83 that have been dismissed due to several videos released by Adachi’s office that show conflicting information between police reports and what’s seen in the footage.

The previous videos showed alleged police misconduct at various residential hotels in the city in recent months, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation has taken over the investigation into those cases.

Godown sought to contain the growing scandal, criticizing Adachi for using the news media to publicize the videos rather than supplying the footage to police investigators.

“If there’s allegations that are valid, we’ll look at them. I’m not going to stand here and not defend the people that work in this department,” Godown said. “We handle our own investigations and we do a good job.”

Adachi fired back that the chief was ignoring evidence that proves allegations against his officers.

“What we’re hearing from the chief is, ‘oh there’s no consequence. I believe the police officer over the person being accused.’”

Adachi said that in Wenzell’s case and in others, the officers “are generating the information that they are relying upon” to prosecute the case.

Godown, speaking at a news conference prior to a meeting of the SFPD’s command staff, said he was “troubled and kind of perplexed” by statements made by Adachi about the case.

“He continues to paint the Police Department with a wide brush” and “screams the sky is falling,” Godown said.

“I’m not going to sit back and let people bad mouth this department, and put out allegations of misconduct when they’re not true,” he said.

The chief said he saw nothing in the video that led him to believe there were any issues with the three officers that would require them to be removed from their regular duties.

“We’re going to continue to do our job and we’re not worried about people videotaping what we’re doing,” Godown said.

Officers are keenly aware that security cameras, iPhones and all manner of recording devices put every arrest and every traffic stop under scrutiny, Godown said, but cautioned that video footage does not necessarily reflect everything that happens in a police encounter.

“Everytime there’s a court proceeding and everytime somebody introduces a videotape to that court proceeding, I’m not going to jump up and down and panic over it,” he said. “Everytime there’s a videotape, that doesn’t necessarily mean something is wrong.”

Capt. Richard Corriea of the Richmond Station said he had “tremendous confidence” in the three officers involved in the latest video.

“If my mom called the police, these are the officers I’d want to go,” Corriea said.

(Copyright 2011 by CBS San Francisco. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Wire services may have contributed to this report.)

  • Raymond F Bockhol

    They are all dirty cops.

  • Deadzone

    And..you are a dirty Criminial.

    • RAVEN


  • Kenneth M. Koehn

    This Chief of Police needs to get his walking papers immediate. We pay this man to be a cohort with liars and cheats. Let’s pressure the mayor to fire his ass.

    • jon

      Why? He is defending these 3 officers, but he hasn’t said the same things about the original officers that were video taped. he isn’t blindly defending all the cops. u seem to be the one blindly judging

  • Matt Sloughter

    Why did the officer climb up to the camera to change the camera viewing angle?
    What was going on that the police didn’t want shown on the video?


    Can’t believe this chief is this fking stupid

  • JCSumner, ESQ

    These are two separate cases. But clearly, the case where proper conduct was proven, and evidence of value was taken into custody, never should have been dismissed by a judge. I now question the ethics and credentials of THAT judge. Officers Zhang and Martinez acted within the scope of their duties. Furthermore, having their names and faces identified in the media has now compromised their ability to complete normal tasks in their duty to the county. If “someone” wants to whisper “dirty cop”, then I’m going to whisper a little louder “defamation of character” and “punitive damages.”

blog comments powered by Disqus
Shine A Light On The Holiday Season With ‘Giving Tuesday’
Food For Families Drive

Listen Live