kpix-7-2013-masthead kcbs 7-2013-masthead

Local

Bay Area DA’s Offices Outsource To Collect Big From Bad Check Writers

View Comments
A collection notice with Alameda County District Attorney letterhead. (CBS)

A collection notice with Alameda County District Attorney letterhead. (CBS)

Elizabeth Cook, KPIX 5 Anchor Elizabeth Cook
Elizabeth Cook is co-anchor for KPIX 5 News at 5, 6, 10 (KBCW) a...
Read More

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

PLEASANTON (CBS 5) – Bouncing a check has never been a good thing to do, and in a strange twist of irony where people are writing few and fewer of them—the penalty for writing a bad one might be harsher than it was before.

Letters are sent to people across the country and here in the Bay Area on district attorney letterhead, requesting debtors to not only pay the amount owed but much more.

Angela Yartz, a bookkeeper who lives in Pleasanton found out she had bounced a check to Walmart when she got a call from someone claiming to be with the Alameda County District Attorney. The call was followed up with letters, all carrying the official seal. But Yartz, wary of those who might try to steal her credit, was hesitant to take action.

It was not until Yartz faced threats of incarceration before she called the DA and learned that all the correspondence was authentic. “I thought it was just someone trying to get their hands on my information and trying to get me to pay more than what was necessary.”

Still, she was surprised that her check written to Walmart for less than $50 had ballooned into a debt over more than $200. She was concerned when she learned that most of the money would go to a third party: Corrective Solutions – a company the Alameda County District Attorney as well as others in the Bay Area contract with to resolve bad debts.

Nancy O’Malley, the Alameda County District Attorney insists Corrective Solutions is not merely a debt collector: “ They run a diversion program to help people manage their money,” said O’Malley.

O’Malley adds her office made numerous attempts to track down Yartz before referring her case to Corrective Solutions.

But those who say they have never bounced a check before think the punishment does not fit the crime.

Kelly Robbins of Grass Valley in Nevada County not only paid her debt but was forced to attend a day-long financial responsibility class. Robbins paid one hundred and eighty dollars and took a day off work in addition to paying her original debt. “I think I was punished too severely,” said Robbins.

Robbins added that she did not like the thought of most of her money going to a private company instead of to her creditor or even the county where she lives.

But whether or not this practice is popular, counties nationwide are using it to keep these cases out of court. In the Bay Area, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties all contract with Corrective Solutions.

Numerous attempts to gain comment from the company were ignored, a tell-tale sign say consumer advocates that they are not the best stewards for public agencies. “In essence they have rented out their stationary to let these collection goons get a piece of the action,” said Joe Rideout, a San Francisco-based consumer advocate.

Rideout doubts whether district attorney offices properly review the cases before referring them. “No one at the district attorney office has even looked at these actual debt much less determine if a crime has been committed,” said Rideout.

The Alameda County Distict Attorney’s Office said it reviews each claim. In San Mateo County, the D-A’s office said it reviews reports generated by Corrective Solutions and responds to consumers when they call with complaints about the process.

(Copyright 2012 by CBS San Francisco. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53,874 other followers