kpix-7-2013-masthead kcbs 7-2013-masthead

News

Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War Zone

by Bill Disbrow
View Comments
UKRAINE-AVIATION-ACCIDENT-RUSSIA-MALAYSIA

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up
Trending Stories On CBS SF

quake flash 082614 Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War ZoneSome Bay Area Residents Report Mysterious Flashes In The Sky During Napa Quake

desmond hague elevator Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War ZoneCaught On Camera: Alleged Dog Abuse By CEO Of Company Tied To 49ers, Giants

nicholas dillon copy Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War ZoneTeenager Crushed By Chimney In Napa Earthquake Speaks From Hospital Bed

454087234 8 Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War ZoneStrong Magnitude 6.0 Earthquake Rocks San Francisco Bay Area, Dozens Hurt, Significant Damage In Napa

keyframe22 Captain Sullenberger: ‘Big Question’ Is Why Plane Was Flying Over War ZoneCaught On Camera: Concord Thief Uses Mystery Electronic Device To Break Into Car

DANVILLE (CBS SF) – During a phone interview with CBS News Thursday morning, Captain Capt. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger  was questioned why Malaysia Airlines flight 17 would be flying over Ukraine’s border with Russia despite ongoing political unrest in the area.

Sullenberger, the veteran of the 2009 Miracle on the Hudson landing, is an aviation expert for CBS News, and was asked by Anchor Scott Pelley why a commercial plane would be flying over an area where two aircraft have been shot down just this week.

“That is one of the big questions right now,” said Sully. “The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has barred U.S. Airlines from flying over this area for some time.”

LATEST ON MALAYSIA FLIGHT 17: U.S. Blames Ukraine Pro-Russian Rebels

“It’s up to each individual nation, each individual airline how much risk they are going to accept,” he continued.

The Danville resident said that, if air traffic control personnel were using both primary and secondary radar, it’s possible that an image of a missile could have been captured on screen, if in fact that is what took down the plane.

Get Full Aviation Coverage:

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53,854 other followers