More Latest Photos

Photos: Pop-Country Act The Band Perry Plays Intimate ShowHugely popular country group The Band Perry played an intimate show at the Great American Music Hall in San Francisco Wednesday night.
Photos: Dr. Octogon Plays Historic First-Ever Show In SFLegendary San Francisco hip-hop group Dr. Octagon featuring rapper Kool Keith, turntable sensei DJ Qbert and super producer Dan the Automator made its live debut Monday at the Independent, over two decades after releasing its debut album.
Behind-The-Scenes At The 2017 CBS Bay Area Spelling BeeGo behind-the-scenes at the 2017 CBS Bay Area Spelling Bee. (Photos by Ashley Cosmi)
Photos: Red Hot Chili Peppers Deliver Hits At OracleFunk-punk veterans the Red Hot Chili Peppers brought their current tour to Oakland Sunday night with support from original RHCP drummer Jack Irons and New Orleans phenom Trombone Shorty.
KCBS Small Business Grant Challenge 2017
IMAGES: Celebrities Rock The Oscar Red Carpet

One Comment

  1. paul says:

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/102/102.F3d.406.95-15739.95-15738.95-15737.html

    Rhonda COLLINS; Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    v. Frank JORDAN, Defendant,

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Ninth Circuit.

    Enjoining or preventing First Amendment activities before demonstrators have acted illegally or before the demonstration poses a clear and present danger is presumptively a First Amendment violation. Carroll v. President and Com’rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 180-81, 89 S.Ct. 347, 351-52, 21 L.Ed.2d 325 (1968); Laurence Tribe, American Constitutional Law, § 12-34, at 1041 (2d ed. 1987) (collecting cases). The generally accepted way of dealing with unlawful conduct that may be intertwined with First Amendment activity is to punish it after it occurs, rather than to prevent the First Amendment activity from occurring in order to obviate the possible unlawful conduct. Carroll, 393 U.S. at 180-81, 89 S.Ct. at 351-52; Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290, 294, 71 S.Ct. 312, 315, 95 L.Ed. 280 (1951) (distinguishing subsequent punishment from suppression of speech); Collin v. Chicago Park District, 460 F.2d 746, 754 (7th Cir.1972).

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS San Francisco

Get The New CBS SF Bay Area Local App
Got Our Weather App?
Listen to Radio.com Anywhere, Anytime!

Listen Live