By Devin Fehely

GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT (KPIX 5) — Majestic trees stand within one of the national monuments that President Donald Trump wants to abolish or dramatically shrink in size.

The Giant Sequoia National Monument falls within Tulare, Kern and Fresno counties.

READ MORE: 'He's In Good Spirits;' Former OPD Capt. Ersie Joyner Recovering After Shooting; Remains in ICU

It’s one of several California sites in the cross-hairs.

Read more: Trump May Open Giant Sequoia Nat’l Monument To Development

Some are on board with the president’s plan, saying it could help reduce fire risk in the area.

The Giant Sequoia trees are some of the largest and oldest living things on Earth, towering giants with limbs stretching skyward 300 feet in the air.

But a battle brewing far below the majestic tree tops could determine the future of the Giant Sequoia National Monument.

“Locking them up in a monument and doing nothing — which is essentially what the Forest Service has done for the past 20-plus years — is not in their best interest,”  said Tulare County Supervisor Steve Worthley.

The Trump administration is considering a plan to shrink the monument by more than two-thirds, from its current 328,000 acres to roughly 90,000, a plan that’s found some unlikely allies.

“I don’t think anybody had an intent to destroy or diminish this treasure that we have in our backyards,” said Tulare County Board of Supervisors Chairman Pete Vander Poel.

Vander Poel voted against the letter sent on behalf of the Board of Supervisors in support of reducing the size of the monument, a proposal so polarizing that only the three supervisors in favor of it would sign their names to it.

Supporters of shrinking the monument say a lack of management coupled with massive tree die-off after years of drought have left it worse for wear — weakened and vulnerable to wildfire.

READ MORE: Fremont Neighbors Of Movie Director Joel Souza Stunned Over Shooting On Set Of Alec Baldwin Movie

They say a smaller monument would be better managed and more protected.

But critics say the plan is not really about preserving or restoring a forest, as much as it is about resurrecting the timber industry.

“Taking any kind of designation from the few pieces of protected land — of intact habitat that we have — is a mistake,” said environmentalist Mehmet McMillan.

The giant sequoia groves and the land surrounding them are currently protected from logging, but that could change.

There is little dispute that the estimated eight million dead and dying trees, just in the monument alone, has increased the threat of wildfire but it’s not clear if private companies would have any interest in bark beetle-infested wood, even if logging were to resume.

I want to protect the Giant Sequoias too,” said Worthly.

But critics say the answer is to increase funding, not to decrease the size of the monument.

“By taking any kind of protection away, in any way, is basically a slap in the face,” said McMillan.

The Carrizo Plain Monument in San Luis Obispo County is another one of the monuments that could be scaled back as well.

On Tuesday, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle sent a letter urging the feds to protect monuments like these.

MORE NEWS: Pfizer Scientist Testifies Against Holmes in Theranos Trial

The group is led by Republican Assemblywoman Catharine Baker from San Ramon.