By Kiet Do

LOS ANGELES (KPIX 5/AP) — Driverless cars will be tested on California roads for the first time without a human being behind a steering wheel under new rules for the fast-developing technology.

The regulations approved Monday are a major step toward getting autonomous vehicles onto the streets of California.

Until now, driverless cars could only be tested with human backup drivers who could take over in an emergency.

One of the few places you can see an autonomous car with no human operator inside, is at Waymo’s secret private test track in the Central Valley town of Atwater.

But the California DMV has officially laid out the ground rules for the next phase of autonomous car testing. Manufacturers can apply for permits allowing driverless testing when the regulations go into effect April 2.

The rules approved by California’s Office of Administrative Law also create the framework under which consumers can eventually buy driverless cars.

The state’s Department of Motor Vehicles says it’s a big boost for regulations that have been in the works for years.

Californians could be seeing empty cars driving themselves on public roads in about a month.

Some of the permit criteria are: companies must tell police the time, date, and streets where testing will occur; companies must continuously monitor the vehicle with a two-way communication link.

And if possible, police officers should be able to disengage the autonomous mode.

In the event of a crash, companies must also submit a so-called “law enforcement interaction plan” which is basically, a way to communicate with police, where to find the registration, proof of insurance, and so on.

The cars are not required to have any special markings, so the only way to know for sure if there’s no human there, is to just peek inside and look for an empty seat.

Glenn Stevens with MICHauto, an advocacy group for the auto industry in Michigan, said, he thinks it’s a positive step for the tech industry and the auto industry.

Stevens says California’s regulatory move will encourage other states, and countries, to keep moving forward on autonomous vehicle technology.

© Copyright 2018 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Comments (16)
  1. Kevin K Rock says:

    i hope they all crash.. this is oppression in disguise

    1. Of course I don’t condone it…but the most patriotic thing anyone can do is to start blowing every single one of them up, with out hurting anybody of course.

    1. You know driverless cars are totally racist because only rich white privileged people in California can afford them…that’s the real story, I wonder if Hollywood will weigh in this.

  2. Tom Smith says:

    Cars with no drivers and Democratic politicians with no brain. Gotta love California.

  3. Vox Veritas says:

    I’ve seen cars on the road — usually — in California. You’re trying to tell me there are actually drivers in those cars?

  4. Anti-racists say there is a RACE problem that can only be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and “assimilates.”

    What if I said there was a RACE problem that could only be solved if hundreds of millions of non-Blacks were brought into EVERY Black country? How long before people realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem, but the conclusion to the BLACK problem?

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

  5. Carlton Clay says:

    Driverless cars are one of the nuttiest things to come about in my lifetime. You are nuts to get in a driverless car. Seems so cool…until accidents happen.

  6. Why not? The driverless cars will compliment the brainless California politicians and their dopey supporters.

  7. Land of car congestion. And now they are going to put cars on the road with no-one in them. Exactly what a car accomplishes without somebody riding in it seems to be ignored here. At least you could safely go full auto road rage on one of these things.Perhaps that is what they are for , to let drivers vent off steam on inanimate(well moving) objects instead of actual humans. Has some merit I guess, in a non-green wasteful way.

  8. I don’t remember the public given a vote to allow this to happen

  9. When one of these vehicles causes a horrific crash, who pays? I got a feeling the taxpayer pays and the crooked politicians reap the profits.

  10. has there been any feedback from car insurance companies … if no driver who has to be insured …

  11. Cody Silver says:

    My first thought was not a good idea….but if you think of all the idiot drivers on the road especially in California it may be a good thing….they are designed to not tailgate, speed or cut people off.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s