SACRAMENTO (CBS SF/AP) — It appears the shipment of high-capacity ammunition magazines into California has started for the first time in nearly two decades after a judge tossed out a ban on sales and purchases of the items, the state attorney general said Tuesday.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra asked a federal judge to delay implementing the ruling while he appeals it.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego said Friday that a law that bans possessing, buying or selling any magazines holding more than 10 bullets infringes on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

In this June 27, 2017 photo, a semi-automatic rifle is displayed with a 25 shot magazine, left, and a 10 shot magazine, right, at a gun store in Elk Grove, Calif. San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez declared, Friday March 29, 2019, unconstitutional the law banning possession of magazines containing more than 10 bullets. California law has prohibited buying or selling the magazines since 2000, but has allowed those who had them to keep them. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

In this June 27, 2017 photo, a semi-automatic rifle is displayed with a 25 shot magazine, left, and a 10 shot magazine, right, at a gun store in Elk Grove, Calif. San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez declared, Friday March 29, 2019, unconstitutional the law banning possession of magazines containing more than 10 bullets. California law has prohibited buying or selling the magazines since 2000, but has allowed those who had them to keep them. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

With the ban lifted, even temporarily, Becerra said in a court filing that “there is evidence that sales have begun already.”

Some online retailers have already begun selling high capacity magazines in California, while brick and mortar stores are still waiting from the go-ahead from the California Department of Justice.

Becerra’s office cited a Facebook ad from an out-of-state, online dealer saying it will ship the large-capacity magazines to California. The ad urged buyers to be patient because of an expected increase in orders.

“We are getting prepared to send a whole lot of freedom to our friends in California,” reads the post from South Carolina-based Palmetto State Armory. The company did not immediately respond to telephone and email messages.

Chuck Michel, an attorney for the NRA and the California Rifle & Pistol Association who filed the lawsuit that led to the ruling, agreed with Becerra that it allows individuals to legally acquire high-capacity magazines.

“There’s dealers advertising them now and there are chat rooms where people are discussing buying them and we’re getting calls from dealers asking what’s legal to acquire,” Michel said.

“The gray area is, what will the status of these magazines acquired during this window be if the stay is reinstated?” Michel said.

If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstates the ban and a 2016 law outlawing possession, Michel said, buyers could be legally required to give up their newly acquired high-capacity magazines.

However, Becerra warned in his court filing that it would be difficult for the state to remove the magazines, even if the ban is reinstated.

Becerra said in a statement that California leads the nation when it comes to gun safety and refuses to go backward.

“Yesterday, we sought a stay of a court ruling that jeopardizes our state’s firearm law prohibiting individuals from acquiring new large capacity magazines. We intend to protect our people and our gun safety laws from senseless attacks. We refuse to go backwards,” he said.

The state has prohibited such magazines since 2000, though people who had such magazines before then were allowed to keep them.

Professor David Levine from UC Hastings says if the stay is not granted by the Ninth Circuit, that would be a large tell.

“If the 9th Circuit turned that down, that would be pretty strong evidence that the 9th Circuit would ultimately uphold what the trial judge did. If the 9th Circuit doesn’t feel the need to issue even a temporary stay, that would suggest that they really agree with the trial judge in this instance,” Levine told KPIX 5.

If the 9th Circuit does take on the case, and that ruling is appealed to the United States Supreme Court, it could take more than two years for a final ruling to be issued on the case.

Benitez threw out both the 2000 law and then 2016 law and ballot measure banning possession.

© Copyright 2019 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Associated Press  and KPIX reporter Andria Borba contributed to this report.

Comments