SACRAMENTO (AP) — Two national groups representing freelance writers and photographers on Tuesday filed the second legal challenge to California’s broad new labor law that aims to give wage and benefit protections to people who work as independent contractors.

While the public focus has been largely on ride-share companies such as Uber and Lyft, the lawsuit brought by the American Society of Journalists and Authors and the National Press Photographers Association says the law would unconstitutionally affect free speech and the media.

The law set to take effect Jan. 1 makes it harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees, who are entitled to minimum wage and benefits such as worker’s compensation. It establishes the nation’s strictest test and could set a precedent for other states to follow.

The livelihood of many freelance writers, editors and visual journalists would be threatened by an “irrational and arbitrary” limit of 35 submissions per year, per client, before they would be considered employees, the lawsuit says.

That requirement draws “unconstitutional content-based distinctions about who can freelance,” the lawsuit argues, noting that “the government faces a heavy burden of justification when its regulations single out the press.”

The bill’s author, Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez of San Diego, did not immediately comment, nor did Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who is named in the lawsuit.

The Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit libertarian group, brought the lawsuit on behalf the organizations and filed it in federal court in Los Angeles.

The two associations together have more than 650 members in California. Their lawsuit asks a judge to invalidate the portion of the law that would affect them.

The lawsuit was filed the day after the digital sports media company SB Nation, owned by Vox Media, announced that it would end its use of more than 200 California freelancers, switching instead to using a much smaller number of new employees.

The California law “makes it impossible for us to continue with our current California team site structure because it restricts contractors from producing more than 35 written content ‘submissions’ per year,” the company said on its website.

The new law implements a legal ruling last year by the California Supreme Court regarding workers at the delivery company Dynamex. But the Pacific Legal Foundation lawsuit says that ruling would have had little direct effect on professionals engaged in “original and creative” work, like its clients.

The law gives newspaper companies a one-year delay to figure out how to apply to the law to newspaper carriers, who work as independent contractors. The California Newspaper Publishers Association, which sought the extension, did not immediately comment on the new lawsuit.

The California Trucking Association last month filed the first challenge to the law, arguing it would harm independent truckers. Uber, Lyft and DoorDash have said they will spend $90 million on a 2020 ballot measure opposing the law if they can’t negotiate other rules for their drivers. Uber also said it will keep treating its drivers as independent contractors and defend that decision in court if needed.

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments (14)
  1. Let’s get this straight: the government is making a law to “protect” freelancers/independent contractors and make sure they have a secure income and benefits. But the law is affecting a lot of freelancers in the small industry such as writers, musicians and photographers, yet the government claims the law will help them, somehow. Many people call it the “Uber/Lyft law” because according to it the focus on the last is to protect those kind of independent contractors, yet those mentioned companies are spending billions of dollars in a ballot to be excluded from the law, what!?